Analysis
Battle simulator
Two stacks, real armour classes, real reload timers. Overkill is wasted and out-ranged units eat free shots while they close.
Side ACastle
650W250G
500 total HPCivilization
Scale Barding ArmorChain Barding ArmorPlate Barding ArmorPadded Archer ArmorLeather Archer ArmorRing Archer ArmorFletchingBodkin ArrowBracerChemistryBallisticsHusbandryBloodlinesThumb RingParthian Tactics
Upgrade bill
2950F550W1825G
Side BCastle
350F250W
550 total HPCivilization
ForgingIron CastingBlast FurnaceScale Mail ArmorChain Mail ArmorPlate Mail ArmorSquiresArson
Upgrade bill
1420F620G
Upgrades
Result
Xianbei Raider wins
8 left standing · 11.6s
Duration
11.6s
Trade ratio
2.93×
resources destroyed per resource lost, side A
A lost
2/10
205 res
B lost
10/10
600 res
0s · 10 v 1011.6s · 8 v 0
■ Xianbei Raider■ Pikeman
Engagement detail
What each side does to the other, per hit and per second.
Xianbei Raider
vs Pikeman- Damage / hit
- 9
- Hits to kill
- 7
- DPS
- 5.88
- Free shots
- 6.4s
- Attack
- 9 +4
- Armour
- 7/10
- Range
- 7
Pikeman
vs Xianbei Raider- Damage / hit
- 23
- Hits to kill
- 3
- DPS
- 7.67
- Free shots
- 0s
- Attack
- 8 +4
- Armour
- 3/4
- Speed
- 1.1
10 Xianbei Raider beat up to 13 Pikeman.
Both stacks are assumed to be in contact and focused on one target at a time. Kiting after contact, collision, splash radius, healing, conversion and terrain are not modelled — treat the result as the maths of the trade, not a replay.